Political watchers say Premier Danielle Smith is strolling a tightrope, diplomatically pleading Alberta’s case to an incoming U.S. president threatening to annex Canada with out throwing the remainder of the nation underneath the bus.
Smith travelled south this weekend for a face-to-face assembly with incoming U.S president Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago house in Florida. It was an effort to stave off Trump’s promised 25 per cent levy on all Canadian items – together with Alberta’s mainstay oil and fuel exports.
Trump is promising the tariffs shortly after he takes workplace Monday. He has additionally advised the tariffs are half of a bigger technique to annex Canada by way of “financial drive.” That has sparked a nationwide debate over one of the best plan of action for Canada.
College of Calgary political scientist Lisa Younger mentioned all Canadian politicians are confronted with the selection between attempting to motive with Trump or get up and threat a commerce warfare.
Younger mentioned Smith runs the danger of undermining Canada’s negotiating stance as an entire if she pursues a particular carve-out for the oil and fuel sector.
Smith getting an exemption would make her a hero in Alberta, however elsewhere, Canadians would possibly see it as a betrayal, as a result of Canada would lose a few of its potential to display to Individuals how tariffs damage them, Younger mentioned.
“So it’s actually a tightrope that Alberta is strolling on this,” mentioned Younger, who conceded that it might be Smith is attempting to save lots of the remainder of Canada from tariffs by emphasizing the significance of the vitality sector.
With Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promising to resign and his Liberal get together in a management race, provincial premiers have been stepping as much as fill the management void.
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and world wide, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you after they occur.
Federal International Affairs Minister Melanie Joly has mentioned all retaliatory commerce measures in opposition to the U.S. are up for debate.
Smith has cautioned Ottawa in opposition to blocking vitality exports to the U.S. in response to tariffs, calling it an “empty menace” that may spark a nationwide unity disaster.
Different leaders have taken a unique method, together with Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has mentioned he needs to maintain the broader retaliation choice on the desk.
When Trump introduced in November he would institute the tariffs, it was tied to his want to stem the movement of medication and migrants crossing the border.
However Smith mentioned Monday Canada ought to deal with addressing the commerce imbalance between the international locations, which has now develop into the largest commerce irritant for Trump.
“The goalposts have shifted,” mentioned Younger.
She added there’s an argument to be made for attempting to come back to an inexpensive settlement with the Trump administration, “if you happen to assume that Trump is an inexpensive individual and is amenable to creating and conserving an settlement.”
Mount Royal College political scientist Lori Williams mentioned the talk over an vitality embargo is a dialog that must be taking place behind closed doorways.
“It’s not one thing that ought to occur in public as a result of it exposes weaknesses,” she mentioned.
Premiers are anticipated to satisfy with Trudeau on Wednesday morning to debate their technique.
Like Younger, Williams mentioned it will likely be a troublesome balancing act for Smith to advance Alberta’s pursuits with out framing different provinces’ major industries as extra reliable targets for tariffs.
“If we begin going in opposition to each other, we’ll be rather a lot simpler to choose off,” she mentioned.
Nonetheless, she mentioned Ford and Smith are talking to audiences that Trudeau can’t attain, together with on right-wing American broadcast networks.
“Since we don’t have, a minimum of at this stage, clear management, there’s a chance to develop that technique the place quite a lot of voices can contribute.”
Duane Bratt, a Mount Royal College political scientist, mentioned Smith is true to talk on to Trump concerning the financial penalties of tariffs that Individuals haven’t felt but.
Going to Mar-a-Lago to clarify to Trump that tariffs damage all people isn’t appeasement, Bratt mentioned.
“That’s actuality.”
Bratt mentioned some will criticize Smith for “taking part in footsie with a maniac,” whereas members of her personal United Conservative Social gathering are aligned with a lot of Trump’s insurance policies and have mused about becoming a member of the U.S. previously.
“That’s why it’s a tightrope on either side. You have already got individuals calling her a traitor, however these are individuals who didn’t like her to start with,” he mentioned.
“However what’s the various? Stick your head within the sand and let Ottawa cope with this? Who in Ottawa?” mentioned Bratt.
Bratt mentioned that by asserting his resignation earlier this month, Trudeau did extra to sign weak point than something Smith has performed.
“We’re weak as a result of we now have no actual functioning authorities. That has nothing to do with Danielle Smith.”
Colin Aitchison, Western Canada director at communications agency Enterprise Canada and a former UCP staffer, additionally mentioned premiers are proper to step up within the midst of a management void in Ottawa.
For him, the danger is Smith not doing sufficient.
“The worst factor any premier might do is sit idly by with out pleading our province’s and Canada’s case,” Aitchison mentioned.
“Premier Smith acknowledges that, and that’s why she jumped on the chance to go to Mar-a-Lago.”
© 2025 The Canadian Press
Source link