A B.C. man gained’t must share his $2 million lottery prize, after a B.C. courtroom rejected his coworkers’ declare the payout was part of their lottery pool.
In a ruling revealed on Friday, B.C. Supreme Courtroom Justice Y. Liliane Bantourakis concluded that whereas Mandeep Singh Maan did take part in lottery pools in 2021 and 2022, there was no proof the profitable BC/49 ticket was bought with group cash.
“Profitable the lottery needs to be a cheerful occasion. On this case, sadly, it has ruined relationships,” Bantourakis wrote.
Based on the ruling, Mann’s coworkers at a freight and warehousing firm claimed they frequently pooled $50 twice per week to purchase lottery tickets. Maan, in the meantime, maintained the group solely pooled money for tickets sometimes, often when there have been excessive jackpots.
The coworkers alleged that between Aug. 12 and Aug. 15, 2022, the group had given Maan money and a free play ticket from a earlier purchase, and agreed he’d buy the subsequent tickets. Maan denied this at trial and claimed he’d purchased the ticket along with his personal cash.
Get every day Nationwide information
Get the day’s high information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
On Aug. 18, Maan found the ticket was a winner, however didn’t inform his coworkers. They found the win 4 days later, when the B.C. Lottery Company posted a photograph of Maan holding the $2 million payout cheque.
Within the days to return, the coworkers initially congratulated Maan, however later grew suspicious and claimed they need to get a share of the winnings, in accordance with the ruling. The group then filed a lawsuit in September.
In her ruling, Bantourakis highlighted discrepancies within the coworkers’ story about whether or not and when Maan was given group funds for the ticket, and located an absence of proof a few constant schedule or fastened contribution quantity for previous lottery ticket buys.
She dominated there was no proof group cash was used to purchase the profitable ticket, nor had been the coworkers capable of show a binding settlement to pool lottery cash frequently.
“Whereas I settle for that not each group lottery ticket buy was documented, whether or not in textual content messages or photographs, the file of pictures that does exist is extra in keeping with an advert hoc course of wherein the events or a few of them agreed on a case-by-case foundation to purchase lottery tickets collectively,” the choose dominated.
“It’s probably, in my opinion, that the members, quantity contributed, and frequency of play might differ.”
Bantourakis additionally discovered the greenback worth Maan charged to his debit card for the acquisition, $10, was not in keeping with the coworkers’ alleged common $50 pool purchases.
“It’s my impression that every of the plaintiffs got here to Courtroom with a sincerely held perception of their entitlement to a share of the winnings,” the choose dominated.
“Although the plaintiffs could really feel that they’ve an ethical entitlement to a share of the winnings, they haven’t established any authorized entitlement.”
Regardless of the dispute, Maan continues to be working on the similar firm as his coworkers.
The B.C. Lottery Company says individuals who purchase group tickets ought to have written guidelines and hold good information to stop the sort of dispute.
© 2025 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
Source link