A Cut price Hunt auctioneer accused of putting his pregnant wife in a headlock has been discovered not responsible of subjecting her to years of violence and coercive and controlling behaviour.
Charles Hanson’s spouse Rebecca instructed Derby Crown Court she was left “paralysed with concern” when he “went for” her whereas she was 5 – 6 months pregnant with a baby that she later misplaced.
She claimed the alleged incident in 2012 was the beginning of escalating violence in her marriage to the 46-year-old television personality, identified for appearances on Cut price Hunt and Flog It.
She instructed the jury he additionally threatened to burn her with embers from a hearth, repeatedly “grabbed” her, locked her in a lodge room, and pushed her in collection of alleged incidents over the next decade.
Mr Hanson denied any wrongdoing, telling the court docket the headlock was merely a hug and he was “virtually a slave” to his spouse who left him “a overwhelmed and damaged man” by controlling him.
A jury of seven girls and 5 males unanimously cleared him of controlling or coercive behaviour between 2015 and 2023, assault occasioning precise bodily hurt and assault by beating after four-and-a-half hours deliberating.

Mr Hanson smiled at his mother and father and gave a thumbs-up gesture from the dock because the not responsible verdicts had been returned on Friday after a three-week trial.
The celeb auctioneer’s mother and father, who had been sitting within the entrance row of the general public gallery, wept and hugged their son after he was discharged from the dock.
Mr Hanson spoke of his aid exterior the courtroom, telling reporters: “I am delighted that after a yr and a half the reality has lastly come out.
“I can lastly stay my life once more. I really feel this burden has lastly been lifted.
“It has been a tormentuous time and all I would like now could be to readjust to what has been such an ordeal. I’m so relieved that that is throughout.”

The prosecution alleged WhatsApp messages despatched by the auctioneer to his spouse, 41, amounted to a “set of confessions” to the fees.
In his closing speech, prosecutor Stephen Kemp stated the messages, together with one during which Mr Hanson promised to by no means once more “lay a finger” on his spouse, present a transparent image of the couple’s relationship.
Nonetheless Sasha Wass KC, defending, claimed Ms Hanson “was not managed in any sense of the phrase” and “felt resentful and arduous achieved by” at her husband’s work commitments earlier than their marriage “imploded” in 2023.
Ms Wass instructed the jury: “The whole lot of the case rests on the testimony of Rebecca Hanson. There may be nothing else. It’s important to ensure that she is dependable, correct and truthful.
“The fact, I counsel, is that Rebecca Hanson is none of these issues and he or she has used this court docket, a legal court docket, as an extension of her divorce battle.”
Source link