By Dan Catchpole
Boeing mentioned on Tuesday that it had delivered 45 airplanes in January, up from 30 deliveries the earlier month and probably the most deliveries in a month for the U.S. planemaker since 2023.
The deliveries included 40 737 MAX plane, up from 25 delivered in the identical month a 12 months in the past, when a mid-air blowout on an almost new Alaska Air 737 MAX 9 grounded the mannequin and introduced Boeing underneath scrutiny from federal regulators.
It was Boeing’s busiest January for deliveries since 2019. It was additionally the corporate’s first full month of manufacturing since a seven-week strike final fall halted most of its business airplane manufacturing.
Plane deliveries are intently watched by Wall Avenue as a result of planemakers acquire the vast majority of their cost after they hand over jets to prospects.
It delivered seven 737 MAX jets to United Airways, 5 to Southwest Airways and 7 to unidentified Chinese language airways, based on the corporate.
In line with Cirium Fleet Analyzer and flight information on FlightRadar24, Boeing delivered 737 MAX plane to Shenzhen Airways, 9 Air, Shandong Airways, China Japanese Airways, Xiamen Airways, and two to Air China.
Boeing additionally delivered 4 787s, together with the primary 787 to TAAG Angola, and one 777 freighter to Ethiopian Airways.
Boeing booked 34 orders for 737 MAX to unidentified prospects and two 777 freighter orders, additionally to unidentified prospects, for a complete of 36 new orders, up from 27 orders throughout the identical month a 12 months in the past. It didn’t document any cancellations.
After adjusting for accounting requirements, Boeing added 42 orders to its contracted backlog: 33 737 MAX jets, two 777 freighters and 7 787s.
That’s down from 142 gross orders in December, together with 30 787 orders for flydubai and 100 737 MAX orders from Turkey’s Pegasus Airways, a longtime Airbus buyer.
As Boeing works to stabilize business jetliner manufacturing in america, a Boeing government informed Reuters on Monday that there’s not sufficient demand in India to justify opening a ultimate meeting line within the nation.
(Reporting by Dan Catchpole in Seattle; modifying by Gerry Doyle)
Source link