By the authority vested in me as President by the Structure and the legal guidelines of the USA of America, together with the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the Nationwide Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), part 604 of the Commerce Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and part 301 of title 3, United States Code, it’s hereby ordered:
Part 1. Objective. Many shippers based mostly within the Individuals’s Republic of China (PRC) cover illicit substances and conceal the true contents of shipments despatched to the USA by way of misleading delivery practices. These shippers usually keep away from detection resulting from administration of the de minimis exemption beneath part 321(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C)).
As famous in Government Order 14195 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties to Handle the Artificial Opioid Provide Chain within the Individuals’s Republic of China), as amended by Government Order 14228 of March 3, 2025 (Additional Modification to Duties Addressing the Artificial Opioid Provide Chain within the Individuals’s Republic of China), these exports play a big function within the artificial opioid disaster in the USA. In Government Order 14200 of February 5, 2025 (Modification to Duties Addressing the Artificial Opioid Provide Chain within the Individuals’s Republic of China), I suspended the elimination of duty-free de minimis remedy on articles described in part 2(a) of Government Order 14195. The Secretary of Commerce has notified me that ample methods are actually in place to course of and gather tariff income for lined items from the PRC in any other case eligible for duty-free de minimis remedy beneath 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C). Accordingly, duty-free de minimis remedy beneath 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall not be accessible for merchandise of the PRC (which embody merchandise of Hong Kong) described in part 2(a) of Government Order 14195, as amended by Government Order 14228, together with worldwide postal packages despatched to the USA by way of the worldwide postal community from the PRC or Hong Kong, which might be entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 am jap daylight time on Could 2, 2025. Further duties for such imported merchandise shall be collected on the charges described on this order.
Sec. 2. Evaluation of Duties on Low-Worth Merchandise of the PRC. (a) Aside from articles despatched to the USA by way of the worldwide postal community (for which an obligation is individually supplied as described in subsections (b) and (c) of this part), all shipments of articles described in part 2(a) of Government Order 14195, as amended by Government Order 14228, which might be merchandise of the PRC or Hong Kong; which might be despatched to the USA; which might be valued at or beneath 800 {dollars} and that will in any other case qualify for the de minimis exemption approved in 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C); and which might be entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 am jap daylight time on Could 2, 2025, shall be entered by a celebration certified to make entry beneath one other applicable entry kind within the Automated Business Setting (ACE) operated by U.S. Customs and Border Safety (CBP) of the Division of Homeland Safety, with all relevant duties, together with these imposed by part 2(a) of Government Order 14195, as amended by Government Order 14228, and paid in accordance with the relevant entry and fee procedures. Government departments and businesses, together with the Division of Homeland Safety, by way of CBP, shall take all essential actions to effectuate the aims of this order, according to relevant legislation, together with by way of short-term suspension or modification of rules or notices within the Federal Register. The US Worldwide Commerce Fee shall proceed to behave ministerially by modifying the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the USA (HTSUS), as wanted, to replicate the actions set out on this order.
(b) Imposition of Obligation.
(i) All postal objects containing items described in part 2(a) of Government Order 14195 and despatched to the USA by way of the worldwide postal community from the PRC or Hong Kong and transported by carriers which might be valued at or beneath 800 {dollars} and that will in any other case qualify for the de minimis exemption approved in 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall be topic to the duties described in subsection (c) of this part. In an effort to handle the specter of the PRC’s failure to behave to blunt the sustained inflow of artificial opioids into the USA, whereas permitting for the orderly movement of authentic worldwide mail, the duties imposed in subsection (c) of this part, besides as required by relevant legislation, are imposed in lieu of some other duties that the shipments would in any other case be topic to, together with the 20 % ad valorem obligation established in Government Order 14195, as amended by Government Order 14228; most-favored nation charges embodied within the HTSUS; and duties imposed pursuant to part 301 of the Commerce Act of 1974.
(ii) CBP is permitted to require the service transporting the worldwide postal package deal into the USA to remit fee of the obligation described in subsection (c) of this part to CBP month-to-month or on such different periodic time-frame as CBP determines applicable, and CBP could subject rules and steerage as essential or applicable to implement and implement this requirement.
(iii) All carriers that transport worldwide postal packages from the PRC or Hong Kong to the USA as a part of or on behalf of the worldwide postal community should report back to CBP the full variety of postal objects containing items and, if electing the obligation charge laid out in subsection (c)(i) of this part, the worth of every postal merchandise containing items, transported per conveyance, in a timeframe and method prescribed by CBP. CBP could require submission of documentation and knowledge from the service to confirm the full quantity and worth of particular person postal objects containing items to be electronically transmitted by way of the ACE.
(c) Obligation Charges. Transportation carriers delivering shipments to the USA from the PRC or Hong Kong despatched by way of the worldwide postal community should gather and remit duties to CBP beneath the method outlined in both subsection (c)(i) or subsection (c)(ii) of this part. Transportation carriers should apply the identical obligation assortment methodology to all shipments; nonetheless, transportation carriers could change their assortment methodology as soon as a month or on such different periodic timeframe as CBP determines applicable, upon offering 24-hour discover to CBP.
(i) Ad Valorem Obligation. 30 % of the worth of the postal merchandise containing items for merchandise entered for consumption on or after 12:01 am jap daylight time on Could 2, 2025.
(ii) Particular Obligation. 25 {dollars} per postal merchandise containing items for merchandise entered for consumption on or after 12:01 am jap daylight time on Could 2, 2025, and earlier than 12:01 am jap daylight time on June 1, 2025, and 50 {dollars} per postal merchandise containing items for merchandise entered for consumption on or after 12:01 am jap daylight time on June 1, 2025.
(d) Bond Requirement. Any service that transports worldwide postal objects containing items from the PRC or Hong Kong to the USA, by any mode of transportation, should have a world service bond to make sure fee of the obligation described in subsections (b) and (c) of this part. CBP is permitted to make sure that the worldwide service bonds required by this subsection are adequate to account for the obligation described in subsections (b) and (c) of this part.
(e) Discretion to Require Formal Entry. CBP could require formal entry, in accordance with current rules, for any worldwide postal package deal that will in any other case be topic to the obligation described in subsections (b) and (c) of this part. A global postal package deal for which CBP requires formal entry won’t be topic to the obligation described in subsections (b) and (c) of this part, and as a substitute will likely be topic to all relevant duties, taxes, and charges in accordance with all relevant legal guidelines.
Sec. 3. Implementation of Obligation. The Secretary of Homeland Safety is directed to take all essential actions to implement this order. In keeping with part 4 of Government Order 14195, the Secretary of Homeland Safety, in session with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Lawyer Basic, and the Secretary of Commerce, is permitted to take such actions, together with adopting guidelines and rules, and to make use of all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as could also be essential to implement this order.
Sec. 4. Homeland Safety Authorities. Nothing on this order limits the power of the Division of Homeland Safety to make use of any accessible authorized authorities granted to make sure compliance with the provisions of this order.
Sec. 5. Monitoring. Inside 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce, in session with the USA Commerce Consultant, shall submit a report back to the President relating to the impression of this order on American industries, shoppers, and provide chains and making suggestions for additional motion as he deems essential, together with a suggestion on whether or not extending de minimis ineligibility to packages from Macau is important to forestall circumvention of this order.
Sec. 6. Basic Provisions. (a) Nothing on this order shall be construed to impair or in any other case have an effect on:
(i) the authority granted by legislation to an govt division, company, or the top thereof; or
(ii) the features of the Director of the Workplace of Administration and Funds regarding budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be applied according to relevant legislation and topic to the provision of appropriations.
(c) This order just isn’t supposed to, and doesn’t, create any proper or profit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at legislation or in fairness by any occasion towards the USA, its departments, businesses, or entities, its officers, workers, or brokers, or some other particular person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
April 2, 2025.
Source link