Jay-Z has filed a defamation lawsuit in opposition to attorneys Tony Buzbee, David Fortney and an nameless lady, who withdrew her lawsuit against the rapper after accusing him of raping her when she was 13 at a celebration in 2000.
The rapper’s lawsuit, filed in Alabama, comes after the unidentified lady added Jay-Z, whose authorized identify is Shawn Carter, to a lawsuit she had filed against Diddy in Manhattan federal court in December, alleging she was attacked by the rappers after Diddy’s limo driver provided her a experience to an MTV Video Music Awards afterparty.
In February, the woman’s lawyers submitted a court document asserting the voluntary dismissal however didn’t embody any causes or rationalization for the withdrawal. The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, which implies the plaintiff can’t refile the identical criticism in courtroom.
Jay-Z’s defamation lawsuit states that the preliminary allegations in opposition to him have been “false and malicious claims” and have been “strategically and tactically calculated and timed to inflict most ache and struggling on Mr. Carter.”
His authorized group is accusing Jane Doe and her authorized group of extortion and being “soullessly motivated by greed.”
Jay-Z claims the allegations have been “malevolent efforts to assassinate the impeccable and lifetime-earned character” of his skilled life.
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and world wide, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you after they occur.
His lawsuit, seen by New York Occasions, claims that Doe “voluntarily admitted on to” his representatives that no assault occurred, and accuses Buzbee of coercing her into pursuing the allegations “to acquire a payday.” (World Information has not independently seen the authorized paperwork.)
Within the submitting, Jay-Z’s authorized group notes that he “doesn’t want to expose his malicious and wrongful accuser’s id in his criticism and seeks to keep up her anonymity as ‘Doe.’”
Jay-Z’s go well with additionally accuses Doe and her attorneys of malicious prosecution, abuse of course of and civil conspiracy.
In an announcement to Selection, Buzbee responded to Jay-Z’s defamation lawsuit, saying, “This Alabama submitting asserts the identical claims as one other case. Jay Z’s group pieced collectively and filed in Los Angeles. Just like the case in LA, this new case in Alabama additionally has no authorized benefit.”
“Shawn Carter’s investigators have repeatedly harassed, threatened and harangued this poor lady for weeks making an attempt to intimidate her and make her recant her story. She hasn’t, and received’t. As a substitute she has said repeatedly she stands by her claims,” Buzbee continued. “These similar group of investigators have been caught on tape providing to pay individuals to sue me and my agency.”
“After talking with Jane Doe right this moment, it seems that the quotes attributed to her within the lawsuit are utterly made up, or they spoke to somebody who isn’t Jane Doe,” he added.
“That is simply one other try to intimidate and bully this poor lady that we are going to take care of sooner or later. We received’t be bullied or intimidated by frivolous instances,” Buzbee’s assertion concluded.
In February, Jay-Z, who vehemently denied the claims of Doe and tried to get extracted from the lawsuit, called the woman’s decision to withdraw her claim “a victory” and stated the “fictional story” she and her attorneys created was “laughable.”
“The frivolous, fictitious and appalling allegations have been dismissed,” he stated in an announcement posted on social media. “This civil go well with was with out benefit and by no means going anyplace.”
“The trauma that my spouse, my youngsters, family members and I’ve endured can by no means be dismissed,” Jay-Z added. “The 1-800 lawyer will get to file a go well with hiding behind Jane Doe, and after they rapidly understand that the cash seize goes to fail, they get to stroll away with no repercussions. The system has failed.”
Jay-Z stated that the courtroom “should shield victims” however the courtroom additionally has the “similar moral duty” to “shield the harmless from being accused and not using a shred of proof.”
“Might the reality prevail for all victims and people falsely accused equally,” he concluded.
Buzbee’s agency, which has arrange a 1-800 quantity for accusers, has filed a wave of lawsuits in opposition to Diddy. Buzbee’s lawsuits allege that most of the individuals he represents have been abused at events in New York, California and Florida, the place people declare they got drinks laced with medication.
Diddy has denied all allegations in opposition to him.
— With information from The Related Press
© 2025 World Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
Source link