In mid-January, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told staff he had “determined to boost the bar on efficiency administration and transfer out low performers sooner,” and deliberate to chop about 5% of his workforce. On the time, Zuckerberg made it sound as if it might simply be low performers who could be affected by the layoffs.
“We sometimes handle out individuals who aren’t assembly expectations over the course of a 12 months,” he mentioned in an inner memo obtained by Bloomberg. “However now we’re going to do extra in depth performance-based cuts throughout this cycle.”
However now, some employees who declare they obtained favorable efficiency critiques and had been in any other case not the bottom performers have gotten caught up within the cuts, which began Monday and impacted about 3,600 employees.
One Meta worker posted on LinkedIn on Monday she was laid off after receiving an “exceeds expectations” ranking on her midyear evaluation.
“I continuously requested for suggestions and was at all times informed I used to be doing an excellent job,” Kaila Curry, an ex-content supervisor at Meta, wrote within the LinkedIn post. “I used to be by no means positioned on a PIP [performance improvement plan], by no means given corrective suggestions, and by no means correctly mentored or offered clear expectations. I merely put within the work… I’m not a low performer.”
One other ex-Meta worker who was laid off mentioned the corporate’s assertion it’s slicing the useless wooden is “flat-out incorrect.”
“I used to be let go immediately—however not as a result of I used to be a ‘low performer,’” wrote LinkedIn user Steven S., a former product designer for Instagram. “Let’s be clear: that label is deceptive, and for many people, it’s flat-out incorrect.” This person didn’t point out or present what ranking he obtained on the efficiency evaluation.
Nevertheless, it’s unclear what Meta qualifies as a “low performer.” The corporate didn’t instantly reply to Fortune’s request for remark.
Enterprise Insider additionally spoke with a number of Meta workers who had been affected by the layoffs and spoke on the situation of anonymity. They mentioned they’d obtained an “at or above expectations” ranking on their 2024 assessments, which might rank them as mid-tier workers at Meta, not low performers.
“The toughest half is Meta publicly stating they’re slicing low performers, so it appears like we have now the scarlet letter on our backs,” one worker informed Enterprise Insider. “Folks have to know we’re not underperformers.”
Diane Brady, govt director of Fortune Dwell Media, additionally known as out Zuckerberg’s labeling of Meta’s most just lately laid-off workers as low-performing.
Source link