The Ford government is going through calls to make sure surplus public land earmarked for long-term care houses is devoted to non-profits as it really works to spice up the variety of beds within the province.
The long-term care minister has admitted Ontario is dealing with “capacity pressures” at present long-term care houses and, as a part of its plan to construct extra beds, the province is counting on public land.
“We have now recognized sure lands in our surplus bundle which we’re working by proper now — some initiatives have already been introduced,” Lengthy-Time period Care Minister Natalia Kusendova-Bashta confirmed in an interview with World Information.
“Actually, we’re working with Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Infrastructure to determine different lands that doubtlessly could possibly be used for social advantages like constructing long-term care.”
One of many areas — a parcel of land the federal government has been assembling for years in Oakville — was offered to Schlegel Village to construct a brand new long-term care challenge.
The corporate instructed World Information the land in Oakville was posted on the market by Infrastructure Ontario and met its must redevelop a house it at present runs in southern Mississauga.
Get weekly well being information
Obtain the most recent medical information and well being info delivered to you each Sunday.
“The actual fact Infrastructure Ontario had the land issues not – we’d be blissful getting appropriate land in an appropriate location from any prepared vendor,” the corporate mentioned in an announcement.
The Oakville website is ready to create 512 long-term care beds, whereas different parts of public land in Vaughan and Aurora are additionally going to new long-term care initiatives.
The transfer, nonetheless, is going through criticism from some as a result of it doesn’t seem to prioritize non-profit long-term care houses over the big, for-profit corporations.
Requested by World Information if the federal government was differentiating between for-profit and not-for-profit houses, Kusendova-Bashta mentioned, “We’re taking a look at all challenge proponents.”
Lisa Levin, the CEO AdvantAge Ontario which represents non-profits working in senior care, mentioned public land earmarked on the market ought to be given to non-profit and municipal houses to construct new beds.
“I really feel strongly that if authorities has surplus land and so they’re providing it to long-term care then it ought to go to the not-for-profit houses as a result of they’ve a more durable time elevating the funding and so they don’t have the identical fairness, for instance, as a big chain,” she mentioned in an interview with World Information.
“Many new buildings are being constructed by the not-for-profit sector however there are some which are stalled as a result of they will’t discover land, so this might make an enormous distinction.”
The push for brand spanking new long-term care beds comes as wait-lists in Ontario balloon.
The Ontario Lengthy Time period Care House Affiliation estimates wait-lists between 2014 and 2024 have doubled from simply over 20,000 to virtually 48,000 folks. Now, half of these ready for a long-term care mattress are caught in ready for greater than six months.
The group calculates that Ontario wants one other 30,000 new areas to satisfy present calls for and, by 2029, an additional 48,000 areas shall be wanted.
Ontario NDP Chief Marit Stiles echoed the decision for the federal government to focus solely its land on the non-profit sector.
She mentioned she was in favour of utilizing surplus land to get inexpensive housing initiatives, or long-term care initiatives, off the bottom however that it shouldn’t be given to personal corporations.
“However this authorities, they assume all of the options are, for probably the most half, for revenue,” Stiles mentioned. “And we’ve seen how the for-profit sector functioned beneath the COVID pandemic.”
© 2025 World Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
Source link