By the authority vested in me as President by the Structure and the legal guidelines of the US of America, it’s hereby ordered:
Part 1. Goal. Federal rules shouldn’t predetermine financial winners and losers. But some rules function to exclude new market entrants. Rules that cut back competitors, entrepreneurship, and innovation — in addition to the advantages they create for American shoppers — ought to be eradicated. This order commences the method for eliminating anti-competitive rules to revitalize the American economic system.
Sec. 2. Definitions. (a) “Company” has the that means given to it in part 3502 of title 44, United States Code, besides that it doesn’t embrace the Government Workplace of the President or any elements thereof.
(b) “Company head” means the highest-ranking official of an company, such because the Secretary, Administrator, Chairman, or Director, except in any other case specified on this order.
Sec. 3. Rescinding Anti-Aggressive Rules. (a) Company heads shall, in session with the Chairman of the Federal Commerce Fee (Chairman) and the Lawyer Common, full a evaluation of all rules topic to their rulemaking authority and determine those who:
(i) create, or facilitate the creation of, de facto or de jure monopolies;
(ii) create pointless boundaries to entry for brand new market members;
(iii) restrict competitors between competing entities or have the impact of limiting competitors between competing entities;
(iv) create or facilitate licensure or accreditation necessities that unduly restrict competitors;
(v) unnecessarily burden the company’s procurement processes, thereby limiting corporations’ means to compete for procurements; or
(vi) in any other case impose anti-competitive restraints or distortions on the operation of the free market.
(b) Inside 70 days of the date of this order, company heads shall every present to the Chairman and the Lawyer Common an inventory of rules recognized by the classes laid out in subsection (a) of this part. Company heads shall additionally embrace a suggestion as as to whether every of the listed rules warrants rescission or modification in gentle of its anti-competitive results. For beneficial modifications, company heads shall briefly specify what modification is acceptable. For rules which can be anti-competitive by design, company heads shall present a justification for his or her anti-competitive results if the company head shouldn’t be proposing rescission or modification.
(c) In conducting the evaluation required by subsection (a) of this part, company heads shall prioritize evaluation of these guidelines that fulfill the definition of “important regulatory motion” in Government Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Evaluation), as amended.
(d) Inside 10 days of the date of this order, the Chairman shall difficulty a request for data (RFI) that seeks public enter on the identification of rules that fall throughout the classes laid out in subsection (a) of this part, in addition to feedback explaining the proposed classifications. The request shall stay open for 40 days. Upon the shut of the RFI interval, the Chairman shall convey any related responses to the company with rulemaking authority over the recognized regulation.
(e) Inside 90 days of receipt of the company lists laid out in subsection (b) of this part, the Chairman, in session with the Lawyer Common, the Assistant to the President for Financial Coverage, and the related company heads, shall present to the Director of the Workplace of Administration and Funds (OMB Director) a consolidated checklist of rules that warrant rescission or modification in gentle of their anti-competitive results, together with beneficial modifications. The Chairman might embrace on the consolidated checklist rules not initially included on an company checklist if such rules fall inside not less than one of many classes outlined in subsections (a)(i)-(vi) of this part.
(f) Upon receipt of the consolidated checklist described in subsection (e) of this part, the OMB Director, by the Administrator of the Workplace of Data and Regulatory Affairs, shall seek the advice of with the Chairman, the Lawyer Common, the Assistant to the President for Financial Coverage, and the related company heads to resolve whether or not to include the proposed rescissions or modifications into the Unified Regulatory Agenda developed pursuant to Government Order 14219 of February 19, 2025 (Guaranteeing Lawful Governance and Implementing the President’s “Division of Authorities Effectivity” Deregulatory Initiative).
Sec. 4. Common Provisions. (a) Nothing on this order shall be construed to impair or in any other case have an effect on:
(i) the authority granted by regulation to an government division or company, or the pinnacle thereof; or
(ii) the capabilities of the Director of the Workplace of Administration and Funds referring to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be applied in line with relevant regulation and topic to the supply of appropriations.
(c) This order shouldn’t be supposed to, and doesn’t, create any proper or profit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at regulation or in fairness by any celebration in opposition to the US, its departments, companies, or entities, its officers, staff, or brokers, or some other individual.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
April 9, 2025.
Source link