NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Merriam-Webster’s word of the year for 2024 is “polarization,” which it defines as “division into two sharply distinct opposites.” (The phrase beat out “mind rot,” however one wonders if it did so amongst dictionary workers.)
In actuality, it’s been the phrase of the 12 months since at the least 2016, when President-elect Trump received the primary time and the left went nuts.
The lefty workers in dictionary land couldn’t deal with being Trumped and began enjoying phrase video games nearly instantly after his victory. Even NPR noted in 2017 that, “The Merriam-Webster Dictionary Has Been Trolling Trump On Twitter For Months.”
You may assume the left would tire of such empty phrases, however that’s simply not the case. (iStock)
The corporate’s phrase play is a component of a bigger leftist technique to both make up new phrases or redefine current phrases to make them match the liberal narrative. We’ve seen repeated examples within the final a number of years – “birthing particular person,” “Latinx” and, the newest, “womyn.”
CNN HOST WONDERS IF DEMOCRATS SHOULD DROP THE ‘LATINX’ FRAMING
The Scripps National Spelling Bee, D-Embarrassment, launched a third-grade glossary for its one hundredth anniversary contest. And “womyn” is included as an appropriate alternate spelling for the actual phrase, ladies. Naturally, in accordance with a Scripps spokesperson, “All the phrases used within the Scripps Nationwide Spelling Bee program are pulled from our official dictionary, Merriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary.”
Contemplate me shocked. (Adjective: stricken with sudden psychological or emotional disturbance.) However that’s actually simply propaganda. Even the lefty City Dictionary describes the phrase “womyn” as, “a time period utilized by feminists who really feel that having the phrase ‘man’ within the phrase ‘girl’ makes ladies a subset of males.” (Scripps additionally authorised “bazar” as a substitute for bazaar, which is simply weird.)
Much more controversial than that spin is the try and get rid of moms from our language, to appease transgender extremists. In July 2022, the NEA, the unhinged union of lecturers who hate America, thought-about altering the language. They needed to ditch the word “mother” and swap it out for “birthing guardian.” “Father” was supposed to vary to “non-birthing guardian.” That’s as a result of precise dad and mom – each moms and dads – don’t like what NEA desires to do to their children.
That plan failed. Even the NEA will need to have realized how insane it was.
One month later, the AP Stylebook decided that “phrases like ‘pregnant folks’ or ‘folks searching for abortions’ are acceptable whenever you need to be inclusive of people that have these experiences however don’t determine as ladies.”
That and all kinds of different kookiness has been embraced by the so-called sciences. Every part from “chestfeeding” as an alternative of breastfeeding to urging workers to “keep away from unnecessarily gendered language” is obtainable on the NIH web site. Staff ought to “use everybody or all as an alternative of women and men and distinguished visitors or of us as an alternative of girls and gents.” NIH tries to place these phrases in another person’s mouth and provides directions on its website with a distinguished hyperlink to the AP Stylebook.
The liberal media defended this nonsense or advocated for it. And nonetheless do. CNN wrote, “The case for saying ‘pregnant folks’ and different gender-inclusive phrases.” The gender-inclusive phrase the story talked about was “penis homeowners.” (You need to write your individual jokes for this one. I’ve written just a few and deleted them as a result of I like being employed.) The community ran that article in Might 2024.
THREE HUGE WAYS THE LIBERAL NEWS MEDIA LOST THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. AND DESERVED IT
You may assume the left would tire of such empty phrases, however that’s simply not the case. Take a look at the ridiculous phrase Latinx. Liberals created it as a result of they hate that Spanish has female and male gendered phrases, in order that they needed a gender-neutral time period for folks descended from Spain or Latin America. However regardless of years of effort, Pew Analysis reported in September that “4% of Latino adults say they’ve used Latinx to explain themselves, little modified from the three% who stated the identical in 2019.”
As an alternative of giving up, lefties merely attempt a brand new bogus time period. In April, Axios wrote that, “Latine is the brand new Latinx.” That’s like saying Vice President Kamala Harris is the brand new Michael Dukakis. It’s not particularly complimentary to both aspect of the comparability.
The article claimed, “‘Latine,’ a gender-neutral approach to describe or consult with folks with Latino origins, is surging in reputation on college campuses, in museums, and amongst researchers and media.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
Not a kind of teams it mentions is definitely Hispanic or Latino. Each single certainly one of them is simply one other elite, lefty ivory tower. So, who do they cite as an professional? Monica Trasandes, “director for Spanish language media and illustration at GLAAD” – The Homosexual and Lesbian Alliance Towards Defamation.
Speak about not with the ability to learn a room, an election or perhaps a dictionary.
And, paradoxically, the article itself ran in Axios Latino. Not Axios Latine or Latinx.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The left’s push to make use of dangerous phrases makes me consider how great phrase wonk Susie Dent may describe it. She calls herself, “That girl in Dictionary Nook” and repeatedly posts obscure phrases from centuries previous. One in every of her phrases of the day from August was, “‘Podsnappian’ (from Charles Dickens): blinkered, self-congratulatory, and satisfied that everybody else ought to see issues the way in which you do.”
That sounds just like the final phrase to me. It aptly describes the grammar goons on the left.
Source link